Lynx Studio Technology, Inc. Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > Lynx Forum > Lynx Support Forum
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Lynx Aurora Thunderbolt and Hardware Inserts PT
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

November 14, 2017: macOS Driver Build 58D now Available
November 13, 2017: Windows Driver Version 2 Build 23i now Available
November 9, 2017: Firmware Update 1.7 for Aurora(n) now Available
November 6, 2017: Aurora(n) User Manual (Firmware 1.7) now Available
July 5, 2017: Aurora(n)-USB Driver Version 3.34 for Windows Available
February 27, 2017: Hilo Firmware 8 User Manual now Available
January 9, 2017: Hilo Firmware 8 Updater Available

Forum LockedLynx Aurora Thunderbolt and Hardware Inserts PT

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
Message
agoraphobia View Drop Down
Caracal
Caracal


Joined: July/19/2011
Points: 10
Direct Link To This Post Topic: Lynx Aurora Thunderbolt and Hardware Inserts PT
    Posted: March/27/2015 at 8:37am
I keep coming across conflicting information on this topic so I thought I'd post here and see if I can get further clarification. I realise this isn't exactly Lynx's jurisdiction, but I'm hopeful you will be able to help provide some info.

This is in regards to my unit - Lynx Aurora 16 with the THUNDERBOLT card (NOT THE HD)

The question is, does PT11 (Vanilla) automatically compensate hardware inserts when using a 3rd party interface? And when I say "automatically" I mean with no need to do send/return trips to figure out latency figures to enter manually in the I/O preferences etc.

I ask this because information online from numerous sources seem to suggest that the ProTools Software won't automatically compensate for interfaces that are not Avid/HD units and you need to figure this out automatically by carrying out ping tests (which is easy enough). In my case I have a Lynx Aurora with a Thunderbolt card and so far I am yet to experience this problem or the need to manually enter delay times, all parallel processing etc work without comb filtering or phasing issues. I have carried out latency tests suggested online and by the ProTools reference guide and it always lines up perfectly in time without any extra manual labor.

I can confirm this because I have done click, pop and tone tests with record tracks and it always lines up. 

So, it's not a problem, I'm just looking to see why the majority of people experience latency issues with 3rd party interfaces such as the lynx. I'm told ProTools can't compensate for roundtrips by 3rd party interfaces because it doesn't know what the latency will be. Is this misinformation? Perhaps I'm naive, but isn't it the drivers duty to report the correct latency figure to ProTools and not the other way around? 

Anyway, thanks in advance!
Back to Top
PaulTech View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group
Avatar

Joined: August/13/2004
Location: United States
Points: 5495
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March/30/2015 at 4:28pm
I suspect the confusion is around ProTools systems with Avid hardware, and with third party hardware. With an Avid system (TDM, HD Native or HDX), if you connect an AD/DA to the digital I/O of a ProTools interface, the delay times from that converter will not be compensated for automatically. 
Also, some third party interfaces that connect via Digilink would require manual offsets to create stream allignment (this is not the case for an Aurora/HD though). 

However, with Core Audio devices like the Aurora/TB, the driver broadcasts its delay times to the DAW, and the DAW compensates accordingly. This is the standard and true for all major Native DAWs. 

The behavior you see is what we would expect. 

Hope this helps...
Paul Erlandson
Lynx Studio Technology
Support
714-545-4700 x 206
Lynx Support and Updates on Facebook!
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 11.04
Copyright ©2001-2015 Web Wiz Ltd.