Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
throbert
Caracal
Joined: November/09/2010
Location: Colorado USA
Points: 30
|
Topic: Lynx for live virtual instruments Posted: July/29/2016 at 10:29am |
Has anyone used the Lynx Aurora/AES16e for live virtual instrument
performance? Looking for experiences, what worked best and how you were
set up. Would like to know if it's a good or bad ideal to use. The
inability to control levels remotely has me worried.
|
|
PaulTech
Admin Group
Joined: August/13/2004
Location: United States
Points: 5495
|
Posted: July/29/2016 at 3:14pm |
I used them all the time. Use the latest firmware and drivers for the best latency performance. You should be able to get down to imperceptible latency with a modern computer.
"The inability to control levels remotely has me worried." What do you mean by that?
|
|
|
throbert
Caracal
Joined: November/09/2010
Location: Colorado USA
Points: 30
|
Posted: July/29/2016 at 9:01pm |
PaulTech wrote:
I used them all the time. Use the latest firmware and drivers for the best latency performance. You should be able to get down to imperceptible latency with a modern computer.
"The inability to control levels remotely has me worried." What do you mean by that? |
What if I need to adjust my feed or monitor level? I would have to go to screen and mouse, I'd rather do that from a controller So how are you set up for live performance, would love to get some details. I have a Kawai ES3 for a controller, GEM Piano Module, Korg tr 76 (don't like the action looking for better), Behringer BCR 2000, MOTU midi Timepiece, Mackie CR 1604 (not for live stage use), Aurora 8 And a home built PC: Virtual instrument hosting system
5 unit rackmount by PAR Metal front of case to my spec back of case from another MSI Z97 MPOWER Intel Core i7-4790K Crucial Ballistix Sport 32GB (4 x 8GB) DDR3-1600 Corsair 750W 80+ Platinum Fully-Modular Noctua NH-D15 Two Noctua NF-A14 FLX, front of case fans Wyndows 7 Lynx AES16e PCIe card future for a UAD card
Would like to not use a mixer, just the Aurora, if possible.
Edited by throbert - July/31/2016 at 1:03pm
|
|
Mike N
Admin Group
Sales & Support Coordinator
Joined: November/13/2008
Location: Costa Mesa, CA
Points: 2488
|
Posted: August/01/2016 at 12:30pm |
Are you mixing down to two output channels? I use a TC Electronics Level Pilot. Works like a charm and it is a passive controller.
|
Michael Nicoletti Lynx Studio Technology Sales & Support Coordinator 714-545-4700 Ext. 211
|
|
throbert
Caracal
Joined: November/09/2010
Location: Colorado USA
Points: 30
|
Posted: August/01/2016 at 1:09pm |
Mike N wrote:
Are you mixing down to two output channels? I use a TC Electronics Level Pilot. Works like a charm and it is a passive controller.
|
this is not a studio setup, but in my case I could use a Rane SM26S to control the level from the Aurora and feed, mix to in ears, have level from aurora to stage if needed and level to FOH. Still If you had implemented a way to control levels from the aurora externally (with the newer firmware and drivers) I wouldn't have the added expense and the added shlep factor. RME allows for this why not lynx?
|
|
Mike N
Admin Group
Sales & Support Coordinator
Joined: November/13/2008
Location: Costa Mesa, CA
Points: 2488
|
Posted: August/02/2016 at 9:23am |
Because it is not desirable to control levels digitally. If you attenuate too much, you affect your resolution.
|
Michael Nicoletti Lynx Studio Technology Sales & Support Coordinator 714-545-4700 Ext. 211
|
|
throbert
Caracal
Joined: November/09/2010
Location: Colorado USA
Points: 30
|
Posted: August/02/2016 at 11:17am |
Don't need to control digital, need control of analog out
|
|
Mike N
Admin Group
Sales & Support Coordinator
Joined: November/13/2008
Location: Costa Mesa, CA
Points: 2488
|
Posted: August/02/2016 at 2:26pm |
Right...Good point. Was thinking of the digital outs...
|
Michael Nicoletti Lynx Studio Technology Sales & Support Coordinator 714-545-4700 Ext. 211
|
|