![]() |
November 14, 2017: macOS Driver Build 58D now Available November 13, 2017: Windows Driver Version 2 Build 23i now Available November 9, 2017: Firmware Update 1.7 for Aurora(n) now Available November 6, 2017: Aurora(n) User Manual (Firmware 1.7) now Available July 5, 2017: Aurora(n)-USB Driver Version 3.34 for Windows Available February 27, 2017: Hilo Firmware 8 User Manual now Available January 9, 2017: Hilo Firmware 8 Updater Available |
|
Post Reply ![]() |
Page 12> |
Author | |
Ossi Miikkulainen ![]() Caracal ![]() Joined: November/06/2015 Location: Finland Points: 13 |
![]() Posted: November/06/2015 at 12:12pm |
Hi!
I have a AES16e-50 and it seems like all of my software is unable to sync with the card. The card syncs nice in both internal and aes50 clocks but there is clicks, pops and noises with all buffer lengths and samplerates. Strange thing is that with card syncing from aes50 (96k) it is possible to set programs to run with other rates. With long buffers (4096 or 8192 samples) the problem does not significantly get better or worse even if programs are running on 88.2k rate while card is running 96k. It is possible to set software even to 44,1k rate while card is running 96k and still get somewhat recognizable audio through. When routing through internal mixer audio is ok as long as card and aes50 source are properly set up and they manage to lock sync. Both software and firmware are latest available and I have tried to re-install the drivers and software. I'm running win7 64bit, CPU is AMD A10-5800K and I have 8gb of ram installed so that should be enough of power. I plan on running vst-plugins in live environment so low latency is necessary. Is there any way to test where the sync is lost or do you have any ideas what to try? Thanks in advance! -Ossi Miikkulainen
|
|
![]() |
|
PaulTech ![]() Admin Group ![]() ![]() Joined: August/13/2004 Location: United States Points: 5495 |
![]() |
You cannot resample the AES50 streams. The card and your AES50 device should always be running at the same sample rate.
So do the problems happen with playing back known good audio through AES50, or do you have the problems with both play back AND recording or input monitoring? When slaving to AES50, does the Lynx Mixer ever show that sync is lost?
|
|
![]() |
|
Ossi Miikkulainen ![]() Caracal ![]() Joined: November/06/2015 Location: Finland Points: 13 |
![]() |
The problem is when transferring audio between card and any software in both directions, when routing from aes50 back to aes50 only through cards internal mixer it works correctly. When playing known good soundfile from computer through aes50 it is glitching as it is also when recording good source and then transferring the file to other computer for listening.
Lynx mixer never shows that the sync is lost as it would mean complete loss of aes50 stream also. If I force another rate or select wrong clock master/slave settings it does not find sync and all audio through aes50 drops. My source is locked to 96k samplerate, if I let it be master and tell card to take sync from aes50 I can choose any samplerate in software but the card is locked to 96k and audio is glitchy. If I tell card to be master at 96k and my source to slave same thing happens, card shows sync lock to 96k, software can be set to any rate and audio is broken. If card is in any other rate than 96k it does not find sync and there is no audio through aes50, also if there are two masters or two slaves at 96k it doesn't find sync and no aes50 audio is present.
|
|
![]() |
|
Mike N ![]() Admin Group ![]() ![]() Sales & Support Coordinator Joined: November/13/2008 Location: Costa Mesa, CA Points: 2488 |
![]() |
Hi,
In Lynx Mixer, is Mixer Lock enabled (Settings/Advanced/Mixer Lock)? It should not be, or else the card will not follow the app's sample rate... Edited by Mike N - November/10/2015 at 9:42am |
|
Michael Nicoletti
Lynx Studio Technology Sales & Support Coordinator 714-545-4700 Ext. 211 |
|
![]() |
|
Ossi Miikkulainen ![]() Caracal ![]() Joined: November/06/2015 Location: Finland Points: 13 |
![]() |
Hi,
No, the mixer lock is not enabled.
|
|
![]() |
|
PaulTech ![]() Admin Group ![]() ![]() Joined: August/13/2004 Location: United States Points: 5495 |
![]() |
If your source is a Midas console, then 96k is the only sample rate you will be able to operate at. Your audio software will need to always be set to 96k, this is the only rate those consoles support,
From the Lynx Mixer click Mixer > About. What is the firmware version of your AES16e card? If it is 14, try this updater and see if that changes the behavior.
|
|
![]() |
|
Ossi Miikkulainen ![]() Caracal ![]() Joined: November/06/2015 Location: Finland Points: 13 |
![]() |
I am planning on using this with a Midas console, right now I am testing only with a single stagebox. They are also locked to 96k except for a few models that support also 48k mode.
Firmware was version 14, I downgraded it and didn't notice any difference. My educated guess is that the ASIO-driver somehow is unable to communicate the sync between software and hardware as both ends report all-ok. If the software is given permission to decide samplerate and the card is on internal clock it is possible to change hardware samplerate from software. (that naturally drops sync between stagebox and the card) I have tried to re-install the drivers but it haven't helped, I'll try tomorrow a complete clean install of windows, drivers and software. Is it possible to somehow extract software clock and compare it to the cards clock?
|
|
![]() |
|
PaulTech ![]() Admin Group ![]() ![]() Joined: August/13/2004 Location: United States Points: 5495 |
![]() |
There is no clock in software that is independent from the hardware. When the card is on Internal, the software instructs the card what SR to run at, and uses the clock generated by the card as a timing reference. If there is a clock disparity it would be between the AES16e50 and the Stage Box.
Why don't you set the Sync Source in the Lynx Mixer to AES50. Then set your software to operate at 96k. See if that works. Also, if you are still getting distortion you might try increasing your buffer size from within the DAW and see if that helps.
|
|
![]() |
|
Ossi Miikkulainen ![]() Caracal ![]() Joined: November/06/2015 Location: Finland Points: 13 |
![]() |
I have tried that, that way it is possible to manually set the card and the software in different rates. If they are running on same rate, the problem still persists. Running with 1024 samples buffer the situation is slightly improved but still unacceptable and the latency is also too long. Even with 8k sample buffer the problem does not disappear.
If the card does not get sync with aes50 the whole connection is dead. Also when using only lynx mixer to route audio from stagebox inputs back to stagebox outputs everything is fine so the aes50 side and lynx mixer works ok. Only when trying to record, play or loop back audio through any software everything becomes glitchy. I have tried every possible combination of clock sources and SR selection sources but so far nothing has worked.
|
|
![]() |
|
Ossi Miikkulainen ![]() Caracal ![]() Joined: November/06/2015 Location: Finland Points: 13 |
![]() |
I have now re-installed my system completely but it has not helped. I'll try next what happens when I route signal from aes/ebu to aes50 using lynx mixer, my guess is that it will work ok.
Is it possible that there is some kind of hardware-specific optimization in the DMA-transfer from card to host-computer's ram or in the pci-express interface? If the problem is in the bus between card and ram then it doesn't matter how large the buffer in ram is as any data to buffer and from buffer gets corrupted.
|
|
![]() |
|
PaulTech ![]() Admin Group ![]() ![]() Joined: August/13/2004 Location: United States Points: 5495 |
![]() |
It sounds like the clocking is OK, since you are able to do hardware monitoring without glitching. If increasing the buffer size helps at all, it would imply this is a bandwidth, bottlenececk issue.
First off, I would suggesting running the DPC latency checker to see if you are getting spikes. If so, this will give us an objective way of measuring if changes made to the system will help or not. Look into your Bios. If you have Speedstep or EIST, disable it. Same with C States (C1, C3. C6, etc).
Make sure your power profile in Windows is set to "high performance" You also might try disabling hyperthreading in your DAW, if that is an option. If you look at the Task Manager > activity monitor, is one CPU showing much higher level than the others? When you reinstalled the system, did you test with the DAW before adding plug-ins? That's always a good idea... |
|
![]() |
|
Ossi Miikkulainen ![]() Caracal ![]() Joined: November/06/2015 Location: Finland Points: 13 |
![]() |
I ran the latency checker and got clean record while there was audible cracks and pops in the audio so that doesn't help. I have also already disabled all power-saving etc. features from windows and bios so the problem isn't that either.
I have currently installed Reaper, Waves MultiRack and Waves Tracks Live on the computer and no plugins. With Reaper it is possible to disable hyperthreading but it makes no difference. No cpu is showing anything unusual, with Reaper only one cpu has any load at all, with tracks live all of the cpu's have some load with only one of them continuous. With Reaper the problem is not so bad, with tracks live it is very bad and noticeable and waves multirack does not start audio at all.
|
|
![]() |
|
PaulTech ![]() Admin Group ![]() ![]() Joined: August/13/2004 Location: United States Points: 5495 |
![]() |
OK, it does sound like somne bus-level problem. What motherboard is this? Chipset drivers and bios up to date?
Is the card installed directly or are you using an expansion chassis? Do you have a different computer you can test the card in? |
|
![]() |
|
Ossi Miikkulainen ![]() Caracal ![]() Joined: November/06/2015 Location: Finland Points: 13 |
![]() |
Motherboard is Asus F22A55-M, the drivers and bios are latest I could find when doing re-install, card is installed directly on motherboard and I've tried to put it also in another pci-e slot.
I don't have other computer right now but I think I can borrow one. Do you know if it is possible to monitor that bus data anyhow?
|
|
![]() |
|
Ossi Miikkulainen ![]() Caracal ![]() Joined: November/06/2015 Location: Finland Points: 13 |
![]() |
I have now installed the card to Intel Core-i5 system with clean os+driver install and nothing has changed. Card is in 1x pci-e slot, control and lynx-mixer works fine but when transferring audio between card and any software problems arise.
|
|
![]() |
|
PaulTech ![]() Admin Group ![]() ![]() Joined: August/13/2004 Location: United States Points: 5495 |
![]() |
OK, sounds like there may be a hardware problem with the card then. Please send your name, address, phone number and serial number to support@lynxstudio.com . Make sure and include a reasonably complete description of the problem as it is currently. We'll respond back with an RMA so you can get that serviced.
Thanks.
|
|
![]() |
|
Ossi Miikkulainen ![]() Caracal ![]() Joined: November/06/2015 Location: Finland Points: 13 |
![]() |
Hi!
Because of all the christmas-hassle I didn't get chance to get that RMA-quote so I ran some more tests. When running Reaper or Waves TracksLive I can get audio through clean with 64 sample buffers, with plugins in Reaper I need 128 samples for somewhat reliable operation. Most of the problems seem to come along between software output and aes50 input of host device as my last plugin in chain is fft spectrogram that shows almost no noise at all but the audio from aes50 has clearly problems. I've also tested recording audio and then playing it back several times and the noise is not in the recorded audio as it shows up in different times. With 256 sample buffers I get acceptable reliability but I'd like to have shorter buffers. The strange thing is that even with very long buffers the Waves Multirack still refuses to start audio. I still get the same message every 10 seconds or so stating that MultiRack has lost sync and audio will be stopped. Is this still likely to be hardware issue or is there something I could test or try? If it is not likely to be hardware problem then I will contact Waves support and ask their opinion.
|
|
![]() |
|
PaulTech ![]() Admin Group ![]() ![]() Joined: August/13/2004 Location: United States Points: 5495 |
![]() |
The Waves issue may be unrelated to the other issues. Worthwhile to check with them.
Also, is there reason to suspect that the AES50 from the Stage box is problematic? Has it been used in another context successfully? I don't suppose you have some other AES50 device we can try with the system?
|
|
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page 12> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |